Representative Leila de Lima will remain in detention after the Supreme Court (SC) affirmed prior reports that it had confirmed its October 2017 choice keeping up the legality of her arrest over drug related charges.
A notice of determination sent to the media on Wednesday said the high court denied “with conclusiveness” De Lima’s movement for reexamination on April 17, when the SC held session in Baguio City.
The notice said the interest was denied “as the fundamental issues raised in that have been passed upon by this Court and no considerable contentions were displayed to warrant the inversion of the addressed choice.”
“No further pleadings or movements will be engaged,” it included.
In October, the SC, voting 9-6, rejected for the lack of merit the Duterte’s critic request of scrutinizing the issuance of a warrant of arrest by Judge Juanita Guerrero of the Muntinlupa City Regional Trial Court Branch 204.
De Lima not long after requested that the Court turn around its October administering, refering to as an “obligatory ground” for her discharge the disappointment of dominant part of judges to concede to the idea of the allegation against her.
In her prior appeal, De Lima charged Guerrero committed grave abuse of discretion when the latter ordered her arrest in February a year ago without first settling her movement to subdue the criminal data against her.
More, she said the drug cases of evidence against her ought to have been alluded to the Office of the Ombudsman.
Be that as it may, the Court decided in October that the regional trial court has jurisdiction over criminal data alleging violations of Republic Act 9165, or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002.
“It likewise noticed that the exclusive original jurisdiction of the RTC over violations of Republic Act 9165 [Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002] isn’t exchanged to the Sandiganbayan at whatever point the blamed involves a position named Grade 27 or higher, paying little mind to whether the violation is affirmed to have been conferred in connection to the workplace being possessed,” the SC Public Information Office said a year ago.
Affirmation of involvement
“The Sandiganbayan’s jurisdiction is restricted to violation of the counter join laws and don’t stretch out to violation of the drugs law.”
As he would see it on the SC’s refusal of De Lima’s appeal, SC Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa said the abscence of a “clear majority” on the idea of charges against the administrator “strengthens its dubiousness and uncertainty.”
“The certain conclusion is that the established right of petitioner De Lima to be educated of the nature and reason for the allegation against her has been wantonly abused, and keeps on being disregarded,” he said.
De Lima faces charges for her affirmed complicity in the exchanging of illegal drugs at the New Bilibid Prison in return for battle supports in her senatorial offer a year ago.
READ MORE: SEC promotes new chairmen